- For the Public
- Practice In Wyoming
- Admissions
- Events
- Nonmember Practice Sections
- Member Benefits
- A+ Conferencing
- ABA Retirement Funds Program
- ALPS – Malpractice Insurance
- Clio
- Cosmolex
- Education Loan Finance
- Enterprise
- eHome Counseling Group
- Expedia
- Fastcase
- Gavel (formerly Documate)
- Hertz
- Identillect
- LawPay – Credit Card Processing
- Level 3 Communications
- MyCase
- Office Depot
- Red Cave Law Firm Consulting
- Solo Practice University
- Staples Business Advantage
- Verizon Wireless
- Lawyer Resources
- Well-Being Resource Page
- Attorney and Law Firm Risk Management
- Attorney Surrogate Designation
- Client File Retention
- Disciplinary Process
- Ethics Help
- Free Meeting Space with Video Conferencing Capabilities
- Judges’ Bench Books
- Law Office Self-Audit Checklist
- Mentor Outreach Program
- Notary Service
- Pattern Jury Instructions
- Planning Ahead: Succession Planning Guide
- Practice Sections
- SOLACE Program
- Trust Account Information
- Wyoming Lawyer Assistance Program (WyLAP)
- Wyoming Law Review
- Pro Bono
- Modest Means Program
- Join Lawyer Referral Service
- Board/Committee Expression of Interest Form
- Find a Job
- Post a Job
- CLE
- News & Publications
- Store
- About Us
- Members
The Law and Neuroscience: Detecting and Addressing Implicit Bias in Jury Decision-Making
March 3, 2022
Virtual
Programs
The Law and Neuroscience: Detecting and Addressing Implicit Bias in Jury Decision-Making
March 3, 2022 12:00 PM-1:00 PM
Sponsored by the Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Section
The biological functioning of the human brain drives all that we do, from survival to complex cognitive behaviors. The functioning of the human brain also plays a crucial role in dynamics of the legal system, including the presence of implicit bias in jury decision-making. While implicit bias itself is not a particularly novel concept, the ability of neuroscience to assist in its detection and (potential) resolution in the courtroom as a whole and in jury decision-making in particular is a novel advancement and unique interdisciplinary approach to jurisprudence. Judges and lawyers should consider utilizing neuroscience to detect implicit bias to promote the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of an impartial jury. While some approaches to blending law and science may be controversial, there are a variety of solutions, some more conservative than others, but all worth exploration out of respect for constitutional principles as well as ethical commitments to plaintiffs and defendants alike.
Speakers
Tori Kricken
Tori Kricken was sworn in as the District Judge of the Second Judicial District, Albany County, Wyoming on January 3, 2017. Before that, she was the Staff Attorney for the Second Judicial District for approximately 14 years. She also served as a District Court Commissioner and Circuit Court Magistrate and as a part-time Drug Court Judge. Additionally, Judge Kricken taught business and law courses at the University of Wyoming. She serves on several law-related boards and committees and is actively involved in volunteer work in the Laramie community. Prior to her employment with the judiciary, Judge Kricken served as a Hearing Examiner for the Office of Administrative Hearings and was in private practice at the firm of Brown and Hiser, LLC. Tori received her J.D. from the University of Wyoming in 2000.