- For the Public
- Practice In Wyoming
- Admissions
- Events
- Nonmember Practice Sections
- Member Benefits
- A+ Conferencing
- ABA Retirement Funds Program
- ALPS – Malpractice Insurance
- Clio
- Cosmolex
- ELFI
- Enterprise
- eHome Counseling Group
- Expedia
- Gavel (formerly Documate)
- Hertz
- Identillect
- LawPay – Credit Card Processing
- Level 3 Communications
- MyCase
- Office Depot
- Red Cave Law Firm Consulting
- Solo Practice University
- Staples Business Advantage
- Verizon Wireless
- vLex Fastcase
- Lawyer Resources
- Well-Being Resource Page
- Attorney and Law Firm Risk Management
- Attorney Surrogate Designation
- Client File Retention
- Disciplinary Process
- Ethics Help
- Free Meeting Space with Video Conferencing Capabilities
- Judges’ Bench Books
- Law Office Self-Audit Checklist
- Mentor Outreach Program
- Notary Service
- Pattern Jury Instructions
- Planning Ahead: Succession Planning Guide
- Practice Sections
- SOLACE Program
- Trust Account Information
- Wyoming Lawyer Assistance Program (WyLAP)
- Wyoming Law Review
- Pro Bono
- Modest Means Program
- Join Lawyer Referral Service
- Board/Committee Expression of Interest Form
- Find a Job
- Post a Job
- CLE
- News & Publications
- Store
- About Us
- Members
A potential client who is unhappy with her present lawyer called my office. May I talk to her?
A potential client who is unhappy with her present lawyer called my office. May I talk to her?
There is a common misconception regarding a lawyer’s obligations when contacted by a represented party who is unhappy with her lawyer. Many lawyers turn such calls away automatically, saying, “As long as you have a lawyer, I can’t talk to you.”
This is the correct response, of course, if you are adverse to the potential client or otherwise involved in the subject matter of the representation. The Rule 4.2 obligation not to communicate with a represented party begins, “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person or entity the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter ….” Accordingly, if you are not involved in the subject matter of the representation, you are free to discuss it with the potential client. Any other interpretation of the rule would chill a client’s option to obtain a second opinion, and would be contrary to the client’s absolute right to terminate representation at any time, as provided in Rule 1.16.
Mark Gifford
Bar Counsel
(307) 432-2106
Share on Social Media